For a family that has lived in it for a considerable length of time, the home is a place filled with memories. What distinguishes a house from a home is this very fact—that is has been lived in and loved. The home in some ways can be a symbol of the family itself, and losing it can be traumatic, especially for children during a divorce. Whether or not you should keep the home is a matter that must be given due consideration. Bryan divorce lawyers will discuss with you which is in your best interests.
The Desire for Familiarity vs. a Fresh Start
During a divorce one party might feel a need to hold on to the home for the fact of its familiarity. After all, so much has disappeared with the divorce, and the family home can be an emotional anchor. On the other hand, it is important for both parties to accept the finality of the proceeding and move on with their respective lives. Holding on to the family home can keep a person from moving toward independence from the relationship.
When a couple divorces, any assets that were acquired during the marriage are considered community property in Texas. The home is generally by far the most valuable asset. Thus, in order for one party to keep the home, he or she must be willing to concede certain other assets. It is not uncommon for a spouse to relinquish her retirement benefits for the home, but this could prove a mistake. Ultimately, the matter of dividing assets can become problematic if one party keeps the house. For this reason it is often better to sell the home and divide the proceeds.
Cost of Maintaining the Home
An important consideration for a party wishing to keep the home is the cost of keeping it up. Not only will the acquiring party need to make the house payments, but there are also continual repair costs to consider, not to mention property taxes. Moreover, all of these expenses will need to be paid with the income of only one individual, unlike with two as was done during the marriage.